Insuring the
Transitioning Pilot
by Tom Chappell, CS&A Aviation Insurance
I have been writing
articles for various aviation magazines for more
than ten years. Recently, I was asked if I ever
ran out of something to write about. Writers
block, they call it. Thanks to you, the answer
is no. Every article topic is in response to
real life questions that my staff and I receive
from our clients, friends, and readers. We have
people call and apologize for interrupting us
with their questions about aviation insurance.
To the contrary, we encourage it. Not only are
your questions a source of future articles, they
are an opportunity for us to give something back
to an industry that we enjoy. –Tom
Chappell
The
transitioning pilot:
This article concerns our
industry’s activity over the past several
months. “It’s The Economy.” Thanks to our
politicians and the media, this overworked
phrase has become somewhat annoying. Annoying
as it is, it does seem to describe the current
tone of the general aviation activity that my
staff is seeing. As the economy improves, our
phones have started to ring with questions about
buying and trading aircraft. Business is
picking up in general aviation and people are
buying and selling airplanes again.
We are having numerous
first time aircraft buyers call for insurance
quotations. These aircraft range from small
pleasure aircraft to professionally flown
turboprops and jets for corporate as well as
commercial uses. In addition, we are receiving
many calls from current clients and friends that
have owned aircraft for years and are now
considering moving up to something a little
faster and bigger and more complex. Single
engine piston aircraft owners are buying
multi-engine pistons, the multi-engine piston
owners are moving into the turboprops, and the
turboprop owners are moving into newer and
faster turboprops or jet aircraft.
This evolution, although
exciting, places a bit of stress on everyone
from pilot to underwriter to decide the safest
way to qualify these transitioning pilots in
their new aircraft. The number of general
aviation insurance markets continues to be very
small and restrictive. It is referred to as a
“hard market” and it is just that. Insurance
premiums are consistently firm, although not on
a significant increase as during recent years.
High or even adequate limits of liability are
difficult and expensive to obtain. We can truly
term it a seller’s market. With this in mind,
you can see that care must be taken in
positioning the transitioning pilot for his next
challenge, insuring his new aircraft.
Attitude is
everything:
We receive a variety of
calls ranging from the sane to the insane. An
example of the sane is the highly experienced
A-36 Bonanza pilot who wants to move up to a
Baron 58. After all, this is the logical next
step in aircraft type. He wants to go to a
simulator based school on his new aircraft at a
recognized facility such as SimCom, FlightSafety
or Simuflite. He then wants adequate dual
instruction from a qualified Baron pilot before
he solos. This is an attitude that we can
easily work with and a pilot the underwriter
appreciates. It is a logical move up in
aircraft due to similar systems coupled with a
careful transition plan. There are no skipped
steps in aircraft selection or training.
Then, we receive calls from
the more difficult buyer. I was told by one of
my proofreaders not the use the term “insane.”
Although sometimes insurable, many calls come
from buyers who want to move up to aircraft they
are too inexperienced to handle. Many of these
candidates are a real stretch to insure and, in
the opinion of many, questionable as to safety.
In short, they are skipping steps of much needed
experience and over-estimating their skill
level. Often the caller confuses ability in the
cockpit with ability to afford the aircraft. It
all boils down to attitude.
An example is the Baron 58
pilot who wants to move up to a single pilot
Citation Jet. You think I’m kidding. After
all, he has heard that a Citation is a safe
aircraft and easy to fly. This type of
transition candidate never fails to proclaim his
ability in the cockpit and his attention to
detail and safety issues. When questioned about
taking an interim step, maybe to include
experience in pressurized aircraft or possibly
turbine aircraft such as a C-90 King Air or a
TBM 700, the question usually falls on deaf
ears. After all, the price of the King Air is
about the same as the Citation Jet (both used).
This attitude is often accompanied by more
proclamations of cockpit skill and safety
mindedness and an example of someone else who
made a similar transition.
Is this an
impossible risk to insure?:
No. Depending upon the
skill of the transition candidate, there is a
slim chance of insuring this risk. But,
everything must be done right. Remember, it is
attitude that may make the difference. There is
no hope if the candidate protests and refuses a
suggested transition plan. The plan may include
a simulator based ground and flight school, a
type rating, followed by 50, 100 or, in some
cases, even 200 hours of dual time with a
captain qualified pilot. (Obviously, the dual
requirement depends upon the type of aircraft
being transitioned into and the background of
the candidate.)
Two extremes:
The above examples are two
extremes in attitude. Both are very real and
examples of the type of calls we receive. The
first candidate’s insurance may be written with
several of the available insurance underwriting
facilities in the U.S. The premiums will be
reasonable and the available limits of liability
will be more generous. The second example may
or may not be insurable at any price. One or
possibly two underwriters will look at this
risk. If quoted, the price will be very high
and the maximum limit of liability available
could be $1,000,000 combined property damage and
bodily injury with bodily injury to passengers
limited to $100,000 per passenger.
It is all in the
transition plan, so pick the right agent to
represent you:
Many insurance agents,
aviation insurance specialists as well as
non-specialists, will take just the basic facts
to the underwriter in hopes of securing a
reasonable insurance quotation for the
transitioning pilot. They only offer the make
and model of aircraft to be insured, the hull
value and the transitioning pilot’s current
pilot credentials, without any transition
plans. This type of underwriting submission
rarely captures the underwriter’s interest.
What can be done to improve
the submission? In the absence of a strong
transition plan, the answer from an underwriter
often is “we decline to quote”. Some agents and
clients expect the underwriter to do the risk
engineering for them. Although some
underwriters will offer suggestions, we find it
much better in working with the transitioning
pilot to develop a workable training plan
before approaching the underwriter. After
all, “you only have one chance to make a good
first impression”. If a dual pilot is going to
be necessary, find the pilot first and include
his/her pilot résumé with the submission. This
accomplishes two things. The professional
pilot’s résumé will add strength to the
submission. Second, the aircraft owner will
know in advance with whom he will be working and
exactly how much his transition plan will cost.
Once declined by an underwriting facility to one
agent, the answer is the same to any other agent
that contacts that market for a quote.
The moral to this thought
process is to plan carefully the approach you
take with the underwriting community when asking
for coverage on your move up to your next level
aircraft. Make sure your agent has a direct
relationship with the underwriter. All too
often, the local property and casualty agent who
handles all the other insurance for a company or
individual will know very little about aviation
and will have no direct brokerage contracts with
the aviation insurance underwriters. In an
effort to accommodate his client, he will submit
the aviation risk to an aviation insurance
brokerage house that in turn will submit the
risk to the general aviation underwriter. This
second hand discussion lacks emotion and direct
knowledge of the transitioning candidate and
often does not result in favorable underwriting
treatment. The underwriter can only judge the
information presented.
There is more
than one way to “skin a cat” or so our more
crafty callers think:
Often, the dual
requirements necessary to obtain enough
experience to satisfy the underwriters require
flying with a professional pilot for 10, 25, 50,
100, or even 200 hours. In some cases, this
could easily be a year or more of flying,
depending upon the speed of the new aircraft and
your utilization. We often get the question:
“Why tell the underwriter about the
transitioning pilot at all?” Just insure the
aircraft as a professionally flown corporate
risk and take advantage of the cheaper premiums
and the increased liability limits. “If I am to
fly with a professional pilot, I will just list
him as the only pilot. Then I will fly along in
the left seat and log the time.” This could
save a lot of money by insuring a professionally
flown risk. “Would I be covered if something
happened and I am in the left seat?”
First, it is always best to
disclose to the underwriter all plans and
information. I recommend that the underwriting
file match what is actually going on with the
aircraft. Second, any attempt to cheat may
create a gray coverage area or even void
coverage. Many policies don’t refer to
“pilot-in-command” in their pilot requirements.
Instead, the requirements apply to any “person
operating the aircraft in flight.” What
insurance policy do you have and how does your
pilot requirement section read? All insurance
policies are not worded the same. How will your
underwriter view your roll at the controls after
the loss occurs?
The solution to this idea
is to negotiate the best arrangement with the
underwriter and warrant in the policy that you
will fly dual only while accompanied by your
professional pilot. Then, when you are
qualified and comfortable in the aircraft, you
need to be specifically approved by the
underwriter to operate as pilot-in-command or
solo.
How do we offset
the expense?:
We often see aircraft
owners with buyer’s remorse. They have become
accustomed to the cost of operation of the prior
aircraft and have moved up to the next level
without giving adequate thought to the cost of
operation of the new aircraft, including
insurance costs. The next phone call is back to
the insurance agent to see what it will cost to
buy insurance to put the aircraft on someone’s
Part-135 certificate. When they are told that
charter coverage is not cheap and the
underwriting requirements can be stringent, they
retreat to give the situation more thought.
Next, they call back to find out what it will
cost to rent their aircraft to a friend, or
several friends hoping to defray their overall
cost. (This is often referred to as a dry
lease.) The plan is that the friends then
sub-contract with underwriter approved pilots to
crew the aircraft. This is the two check rule.
One check is written to the aircraft owner for
the use of the aircraft and the second check to
the crew.
Although this may be
frequently done, it creates a complex situation
both for the insurance placement as well as
increasing liability exposures inherent to
commercial operations. The aircraft is not
officially being flown Part-135 but it is being
operated for a charge. Real charter operators
jokingly refer to this as part-134½. The closer
to charter you are, the more responsibility you
assume for the safety of the passengers. Is
this legal with the FAA? I hear different
opinions and must advise that it is somewhat a
gray area. Can it be insured? Yes, with
certain underwriters. The details should be
carefully worked out, however, with the
underwriter and the owner’s attorney and an
opinion from the local FAA. It is a legal
minefield.
Can the New Age
Aircraft Be Insured?:
If I put up a deposit on a
new generation aircraft, can it be insured? Can
I fly it? The answer is maybe. Which aircraft
are you considering? What will your
qualifications be by the time the aircraft is
delivered? Prepare yourself now. Don’t wait
until the aircraft is delivered.
I know of at least six new
age turboprop aircraft and seven new age jet
aircraft currently scheduled for production and
delivery between now and year the 2006. I
imagine some will be excellent, revolutionary
aircraft and some will never reach production.
Some of these designers and manufacturers are
doing their homework. They are wisely visiting
the general aviation underwriters in an attempt
to introduce their new design and to educate the
underwriter on the safety features and training
they will support. What are the repair costs?
How available will they make replacement parts?
Those manufacturers that answer these questions
are the ones that the insurance companies will
gamble on first. Those that overlook this step
may find a very hostile underwriting market for
their potential new aircraft buyer.
Also of interest to the
underwriter and to you, the prospective buyer,
is whether the manufacturer carries products
liability insurance, and if so, how much? I
think it is safe to say that a manufacturer such
as Honda or Cessna is adequately protected.
What about the unknown company, the startup that
is new to the aviation industry? It is worth
asking the question before you put down a
deposit. Maybe you should ask for a certificate
of insurance, as well.
If a “new age” manufacturer
has products liability insurance and has
properly introduced his product to the
underwriting community, insurance should be
available, assuming of course that it is a well
designed aircraft. You may want to include a
statement in your deposit/purchase contract
allowing you a full deposit return if insurance
is not readily available at the time of
delivery.
The first time
corporate owner:
And then we have the first
time corporate owner. He is not a pilot but he
needs or wants a company plane. The company can
afford it, and flying commercial has become no
fun at all. His friend has a turbine or a jet
and he wants one as well. If I can buy a car I
can buy an aircraft, right? I think I like the
blue one best. OOPS! We need a pilot or is it
two? Fred’s son is a CFI at the local flying
school. You have to be good to be an
instructor, right? Wait, we need insurance.
Call our property and casualty agent and let him
handle it.
And now the problems
start. You may think that this scenario is
ridiculous. And if it were not real, I would
agree with you. A great idea and a potentially
pleasant experience can be ruined because of
what people don’t know. A good aircraft dealer
or broker can save the buyer thousands of
dollars and great disappointment by helping to
select the right aircraft. We have already
spoken of the need to have a strong aviation
insurance agent to represent you to the
underwriting community. What bears some
discussion is the selection of the right pilot
or pilots to crew the new aircraft. Since most
of my readers are pilots, this statement seems
unnecessary, but to those like our fictitious
corporate owner, the crew is everything. From
my perspective in placing the insurance, a
mature, well trained, experienced pilot is the
underwriter’s primary concern. It is easier to
hire a qualified pilot in the first place than
to try to train an under-qualified one. It is
safer, and, although the salary may be a bit
higher, it is always cheaper.
The
transitioning process in a nutshell:
Transitioning to the next
level in aviation is always a challenge. It can
also be a lot of fun and quite rewarding if done
correctly. Pick the right aircraft. Invest in
the proper training. Leave your ego at home and
fly with a veteran professional pilot who has
experience in your new make and model aircraft.
(This may be recommended whether your insurance
underwriter requires it or not.) When you go to
extra training measures, make sure your
underwriter knows what you have done. Send in
copies of all training certificates and written
progress reports from your dual professional
pilot. Keeping the underwriter abreast of your
progress not only builds a strong underwriting
file but it will improve your image and could
save valuable premium dollars at your next
insurance policy renewal. As mentioned above,
(I like to say this part) pick a professional
aviation insurance agent to help negotiate your
insurance placement.
|
Metro Atlanta
114 Townpark Dr. NW, Ste.
310
Kennesaw, GA 30144
1.800.761.2557
TEL: (770) 794.7500
FAX: (770) 794.2394 |
Metro Nashville
1006 Merylinger Court
Franklin, TN. 37067
1.800.999.1109
TEL: (615) 435.8300
FAX: (615) 435.8330 |